Advances in car technology

Ok we have one - here's an opportunity to have one - if you got a point of view about something and want to share it - here's where you do it.
Post Reply
Chas
ALPINA
ALPINA
Posts: 3993
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 11:37 am
Location: Aberdeenshire

Advances in car technology

Post by Chas » Fri May 18, 2012 3:15 pm

It's been a while since I've spouted some verbal diahorrea; this time it's all about Bluemotion...

My car is currently in the dealer bodyshop for rectification of a faulty windscreen seal, following replacement of the same there last year. They were short of customer cars so I've been given the manager's own car instead. Unfortunately, the BMW bodyshop in Aberdeen is also the VW bodyshop so I have the joys of a VW Jetta Bluemotion. I've no idea what size of engine it has but I do know it's an oil-burner.

What can I say about it? It's white, it has 4 wheels, it gets me from A to B on my daily commute. and the fuel economy is bordering on unbelieveable. That last point has to be stressed. If the digital indicator is to be believed, it's getting 60+ mpg within 30 seconds of start up on a cold morning and reaching the national speed limit for an A-road. It's registering 150-200 mpg when cruising down the slightest of inclines where my B10 would be nudging 30mpg. I fully accept that this thing would cut my annual fuel bill by over 60% :shock:

Aside from the fuel economy, let me list the other positive aspects of it

...

...

Nope, I honestly can't think of any :roll:

Don't get me wrong; it's a perfectly acceptable form of transport for those who see a car as an alternative to public transport. Maybe I'm just being a snob but I can't get excited about swathes of black plastic and black fabric, even if the digital information centre between the dials is quite funky and informative - it gives instant fuel consumption and I'm therefore looking at it a lot (in astonishment) :shock:

In terms of driving dynamics, it feels like a kids toy boat in a bucket of porridge. Don't ask how the roadholding is because it doesn't give me the confidence to press on whatsoever. It's quiet and comfortable and can carry 4 people with their luggage. It's as fast as I'd want it to go and it has enough torque to provide some accidental wheelspin in the wet.

But does it excite me? No! Does it even interest me? No... other than wondering how the heck it can achieve three times the average economy of my B10 which is probably a similar size and weight.

I have considered getting a small commuting car in order to save my bigger engined cars the trouble and expense of getting me to work. However, even the numbers don't stack up when you consider that one of these would cost a large chunk of cash to buy. On the basis of 12k miles per annum, I'd be saving £2k per annum on fuel but losing far more in terms of depreciation and driving enjoyment. I just can't justify it.

So I'm going to be paying £150 every couple of weeks for a tank of fuel for the forseeable future :evil:

E24man
ALPINA
ALPINA
Posts: 2376
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:41 am
Location: Surrey

Post by E24man » Fri May 18, 2012 3:33 pm

Good rant and I agree with your conclusion :D
E24man

2001 Alpina B10 V8 Touring (1 of 12 rhd)
1997 Alpina B12 5.7 L (1 of 2 rhd)
1995 Alpina B10 4.6 Touring (1 of 1 rhd)
1985 BMW M635CSi (1 of 524 rhd made, but less than half left now)
1982 BMW 635CSiA (1 of only hundreds left from the thousands made and still valiantly fighting a rusty grave)

ade and liz flint
ALPINA
ALPINA
Posts: 7092
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:33 pm

Post by ade and liz flint » Fri May 18, 2012 3:45 pm

We test drove a couple of VW vehicles a couple of years back - the Golf GTD and the Scirocco 2.0TSi. What can we remember of them? Oh yes, similar to you. Acres of black plastic, dull as the inside of a plastic bag and totally soul-less. The GTD handled well for a FWD car, but to spec as we wanted was £27k :shock: and the 2.0TSi Scirrocco couldn't put the power down without leaving tyres behind. It was the dullest, daftest, most pointless coupe I'd ever been in ...and it has a fat arse when you look out through the mirrors :lol: If we had bought the GTD, I'd be bored already and it would have been sold by now.

The Bluemotion has those horrid low rolling resistance tyres and some trick suspension...hence it rolls around a bit on the bends :shock:

We recently came to the conclusion that the majority of new cars just don't have any soul, and most look soooo alike it's hard to differentiate different manufacturers.
Current:
E91 B3SBiturbo #127
981 Porsche Cayman GTS
Focus STline dog wagon

Previously loved:
ALPINA: E92 B3SBiturbo #285, E90 D3Biturbo #097, E85 Roadster S #168 & variety of 'grey' 4 and 6-cyl BMW lumps.
PORSCHE: Macan S, Cayman 981 S

joylove
ALPINA
ALPINA
Posts: 1729
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:30 pm

Post by joylove » Fri May 18, 2012 4:05 pm

When buying a new car, the first question people used to ask how quick to got to 60. Now they ask what the MPG is.

What they don't ask is what trickery is involved to get there and how much will it cost to fix and service.

VAG diesels use 1L of oil per 1000 miles (and this is considered normal). That's a lot of money between services. Modern fuel pumps cost over a grand. The engine gets blocked with carbon. Turbo seals fail. You need to top up a tank of urea (any it's not cheap) at a major service.

However there have always been people that buy 5m of 'car'. They buy Vauxhalls, making their buying decision on whether they can plug in their iPod or fit the baby trolley in the boot, or whether it does 55 or 58MPG or fits in a certain tax bracket.
Image

User avatar
Charles
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7065
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 2:44 am
Location: Oxford

Post by Charles » Sat May 19, 2012 12:18 am

300bhp, 0-60 in under 6 seconds, 26mpg, space for the dog in the boot, good for another 200k miles ...

... works for me :twisted:
Charles
Teacher of Chemistry and driver of ALPINAs - not necessarily in that order ;)
B3S Touring (49/116) - been to the moon and now on the way back!
Renault Grand Espace - not mine but the wife's!

ade and liz flint
ALPINA
ALPINA
Posts: 7092
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:33 pm

Post by ade and liz flint » Sat May 19, 2012 12:26 am

Charles wrote:300bhp, 0-60 in under 6 seconds, 26mpg, space for the dog in the boot, good for another 200k miles ...

... works for me :twisted:
Can't get the dog in the boot of ours :? Is something wrong with it :roll:
Current:
E91 B3SBiturbo #127
981 Porsche Cayman GTS
Focus STline dog wagon

Previously loved:
ALPINA: E92 B3SBiturbo #285, E90 D3Biturbo #097, E85 Roadster S #168 & variety of 'grey' 4 and 6-cyl BMW lumps.
PORSCHE: Macan S, Cayman 981 S

B10BRW
ALPINA
ALPINA
Posts: 3627
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Weald of Kent

Post by B10BRW » Sat May 19, 2012 12:44 am

ade and liz flint wrote:
Can't get the dog in the boot of ours :? Is something wrong with it :roll:
I didn't know you had a St Bernard :shock: , surprising what you can get in the boot of a Roadster though :lol:

B10BRW
ALPINA
ALPINA
Posts: 3627
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Weald of Kent

Re: Advances in car technology

Post by B10BRW » Sat May 19, 2012 1:01 am

Chas wrote:It's been a while since I've spouted some verbal diahorrea; this time it's all about Bluemotion...
Just had an interesting experience with A VW Bluemotion, this one was a Passat CC.

A friend from the states visited us with the VW she had just hired.
My drive is very steep, and when she drove in she parked about an inch from my front bumper :(
Getting off the drive was a nightmare, she gave up and got me to do it, first of all the PDC was going constantly, the combination of an Auto, electric hand brake and the hillhold it did not want to reverse, plus everytime I took my foot of the throttle it stopped itself :evil:
Being fueled by the devil, it would not rev :? .
I finally got it off my drive by reversing with the hillhold full on, with lots of smoke.
Don't you just love technology :D

Give me petrol, and a car I can hold on the handbrake.

rincewind
AL
AL
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 9:27 pm
Location: Essex

Talking new cars - new Lexus GS450h

Post by rincewind » Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:35 am

Lexus GS 450h (new one) Drove one the other day. Yes, it does 35 -40 mpg and yes, it gets to 60 in 5.9 secs and yes it's very comfy and quiet.

And utterly soulless. And bland. And it has a horrible CVT gearbox.

So agree with all the above. Sod the fuel consumption. Get a car with soul.

My 1st car was one of these:

https://plus.google.com/photos/11318912 ... 6616685009

And it had more character than all the bluemotions put together.

nealpina
ALPINA
ALPINA
Posts: 3356
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:00 am

Re: Talking new cars - new Lexus GS450h

Post by nealpina » Fri Jun 29, 2012 12:58 am

rincewind wrote:My 1st car was one of these:

https://plus.google.com/photos/11318912 ... 6616685009
Image

A huge fan of 1600E Cortina. One of my friend's had his one stolen :cry: .

Also love the colour - very similar to Mora Metallic :D
Oscar Wilde & Burkard Bovensiepen: I have the simplest tastes. I am always satisfied with the best.

ALPINA B3 3.2 Coupe Switch-Tronic ALPINA Blue
ALPINA B10 3.3 Saloon Manual Mora Metallic

Post Reply